Which leaves us helpless helpless helpless helpless
Tupelo is going to publish manuscripts from Harold Schweizer
and Annie Guthrie, from out of their open reading period.That’s good, I’m sure, but what I’m
interested in is the length of the lists for Honorable Mention and Other
Remarkable Work.There are a LOT of
manuscripts out there.I just thought I
should repost this list.We’re living in
a very crowded room, people.“The chains
are locked and tied across my door,” as Neil Young would say it. Here's the electric version:
Honorable Mentions:
Seth Abramson, Madison, Wisconsin, Thievery
Desirée Alvarez, New York, New York, Enchanted Ground
Geoffrey Babbitt, Geneva, New York, Appendices Pulled from a
Study on Light
Hadara Bar-Nadav, Kansas City, Missouri, Lullaby (with Exit
Sign)
Margo Berdeshevsky, Paris, France, The Breaking Book
Deb Casey, Eugene, Oregon, Mothertongue
Victoria Chang, Rossmoor, California, Dear P. and The Boss
Gary Hawkins, Black Mountain, North Carolina, Worker
Paul Hoover, Mill Valley, California, Gravity's Children /
The Windows
Luisa A. Igloria, Norfolk, Virginia, Ode to the Heart
Smaller than a Pencil Eraser
Diane Kirsten Martin, San Francisco, California, Hue and Cry
Juliet Rodeman, Colombia, Missouri, The Voice Of That
Singing
Broc Rossell, Denver, Colorado, Cark
Martha Silano, Seattle, Washington, House of Mystery
Peter Strekfus, Northport, Alabama, Errings
Eliot Khalil Wilson, Golden, Colorado, This Island of Dogs
Sam Witt, Framingham, Massachusetts, Little Doomesday Books
Anon, Tupelo can't afford to publish them all, as poetry barely breaks even. But your point is taken. I feel that same way when a journal rejects someone's work with a note saying how much they enjoyed the poems. I mean, if you enjoyed the poems, why did you reject them? You know?
Fuzz (and John), it can mean several things. It can mean "We enjoyed your poems...but not quite enough," or "We enjoyed your poems...but frankly we enjoyed other work more." It can mean "We really enjoyed your poems...but we're overstocked and have no space for them in our journal right now." And it can mean "I really enjoyed your poems, personally, but some other people on the editorial board didn't, sorry."
Also, some of these manuscripts have already been picked up by other presses. Starzinger's just won the Barrow Street prize, and Abramson's won the Akron prize. Chang has signed at least one of hers too.
BK, if you were convinced you "never had a chance of winning anyway," why did you submit to the Barrow Street contest in the first place? I confess I'm curious.
the same reason the hundreds of others who knew they didn't have a chance and yet paid their money entrance fee to enter this contest:
as an incentive to focus one's efforts . . . as a motivational tool.
If that's not a good enough reason, Anon, I'm sorry. I sent the book out in June to 3 other contests also, and didn't win those either (nor make it onto the runners-up list) . . .
But what's your point, Anon—— are you saying that I shouldn't have wasted my time and money, that I should just accept the fact that no publisher will publish my books, that no magazine will publish my poems, and therefore I should stop trying, stop altogether, stop writing? . . .
though i shouldn't assume that others' reasons for entering these book contest were the same as mine; forgive me for claiming to know what their motives were . . .
Speaking of Neil Young, have you read that new book by him, John? I saw some cool excerpts from it in Rolling Stone. Was wondering what you think of it.
I haven't. I will at some point, I'm sure, though. I've heard some people like it and some others REALLY dislike it. But NY's always kind of been that way.
John Gallaher is the author of the books of poetry, Gentlemen in Turbans, Ladies in Cauls, The Little Book of Guesses, and Map of the Folded World, as well as the free online chapbook, Guidebook from Blue Hour Press, and, with with the poet G.C. Waldrep Your Father on the Train of Ghosts, BOA, 2011. His next book will be the book-length essay-poem In a Landscape, coming out in 2015 from BOA.
Other than that, he's co-editor of The Laurel Review and GreenTower Press.
15 Comments:
so why don't you tupe lows publish them all?
Brian Swan . . . any relation to Brian Swann?
The extra n is for No.
In other news, I recognize exactly 0 of those names.
On a second scanning, I did pick out two names.
Also, I hope Molly Tenebaum writes Wes Anderson-esque poems.
I recognized about 15, I think. I didn't count.
Anon, Tupelo can't afford to publish them all, as poetry barely breaks even. But your point is taken. I feel that same way when a journal rejects someone's work with a note saying how much they enjoyed the poems. I mean, if you enjoyed the poems, why did you reject them? You know?
That happened to me the last time I submitted. Bateau sent me a handwritten note saying they really enjoyed my poems, but didn't want to publish them.
Still not quite sure what to make of it.
Fuzz (and John), it can mean several things. It can mean "We enjoyed your poems...but not quite enough," or "We enjoyed your poems...but frankly we enjoyed other work more." It can mean "We really enjoyed your poems...but we're overstocked and have no space for them in our journal right now." And it can mean "I really enjoyed your poems, personally, but some other people on the editorial board didn't, sorry."
I've used it in all of these ways.
Also, some of these manuscripts have already been picked up by other presses. Starzinger's just won the Barrow Street prize, and Abramson's won the Akron prize. Chang has signed at least one of hers too.
GC,
That sounds reasonable. Kind of like the "can't we just be friends" argument when you don't want to date someone.
Starzinger's book beat mine out for that Barrow St contest . . . which I never had a chance of winning anyway . . . :
http://knottpoetryblog.blogspot.com/2012/10/loser.html
... so eventually the good books find publishers, and the bad ones like mine don't.
BK, if you were convinced you "never had a chance of winning anyway," why did you submit to the Barrow Street contest in the first place? I confess I'm curious.
Anon, my pathetic answer:
the same reason the hundreds of others who knew they didn't have a chance and yet paid their money entrance fee to enter this contest:
as an incentive to focus one's efforts . . . as a motivational tool.
If that's not a good enough reason, Anon, I'm sorry. I sent the book out in June to 3 other contests also, and didn't win those either (nor make it onto the runners-up list) . . .
But what's your point, Anon—— are you saying that I shouldn't have wasted my time and money, that I should just accept the fact that no publisher will publish my books, that no magazine will publish my poems, and therefore I should stop trying, stop altogether, stop writing? . . .
though i shouldn't assume that others' reasons for entering these book contest were the same as mine; forgive me for claiming to know what their motives were . . .
Speaking of Neil Young, have you read that new book by him, John? I saw some cool excerpts from it in Rolling Stone. Was wondering what you think of it.
I haven't. I will at some point, I'm sure, though. I've heard some people like it and some others REALLY dislike it. But NY's always kind of been that way.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home